[Insight-users] [Insight-developers] ITK Tcon 2.0 today, Agenda

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Dan,

Thanks for attending the tcon.
(yeap, we probably should find a better name than "tcon" at this point)


As we discussed, a draft list of papers to move from the Insight Journal
to the Code/Review directory for the release of ITK 3.10 has been added
to the Wiki page:

http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_Schedule#Release_3.10_Schedule

The "Generalized Computation of Gaussian Derivatives Using ITK" paper
has been added to this list. Please feel free to keep adding any other
papers that you consider interesting.

 From this list we will prioritize papers, and get volunteers who will
move the papers into the Code/Review directory.

As we do this, the rule is to make sure that the tests that came with
the paper are moved into the Testing/Code/Review directory, and that
we maintain the KWStyle (Style checker) submission at zero errors.

Thanks for volunteering to help move papers.



    Regards,


        Luis


---------------------
Dan Mueller wrote:
> Hi Lius,
> 
> I can not attend the Tcon (is that still a good name?) today, but I am
> curious what process is used to determine the transfer of Insight
> Journal papers to the review folder.
> 
> Some of the articles being considered for inclusion (as listed on the
> Wiki agenda) are quite new, in fact the only submission which has been
> reviewed by a human is #301. So why are these new publications with no
> reviews being considered over publications with proven applicability
> (more views/downloads) and quality (more human reviews)?
> 
> Take for example:
>    http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/publication/179
> It was originally submitted over 12 months ago, has considerable views
> and downloads (views: 1955, downloads: 716), and two human reviews. (I
> must concede the automated tests are not 100% at the moment, but if
> the paper was considered for inclusion, I'm sure the author could
> rectify that). There are of course other examples, however this is one
> that I personally want to see in ITK proper.
> 
> Is the process of transfer from IJ to review folder simply a developer
> or user saying to the ITK gatekeepers: "hey, I want such and such
> paper considered for inclusion"?
> 
> Cheers, Dan
> 
> 2008/9/19 Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>:
> 
>>The agenda for today's ITK Tcon 2.0 is now available in the Wiki.
>>
>>   http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Agenda%26Status_091908
>>
>>We will discuss:
>>
>> * The release schedule for ITK 3.10
>> * Moving papers from the Insight Journal into the Review dir
>> * itk::Image behaving like itk::OrientedImage
>> * Lesion sizing toolkit in development
>> * ImageIO API for GUI support
>>
>>Please feel free to add any topics.
>>
>>
>>Instructions to join the Tcon are available at
>>
>>http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_in_Second_Life
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>    Luis
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Insight-developers mailing list
>>Insight-developers at itk.org
>>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>
> 
>