[Insight-users] [Insight-developers] ITK Tcon 2.0 today, Agenda

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Gaetan,

My apologies for my poor presentation of the agenda.

The list of Insight Journal papers to move to the Review directory
as part of the upcoming release ITK 3.10, was not meant to be final
by any means. Instead, it was intended to be a starting point for
discussion.

The suggested list is now at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_Schedule#Release_3.10_Schedule


Please feel free to add other papers to the list, and also, let's
discuss the merits of the ones that have been suggested already.


Then we will invite volunteers to move the papers of their interest.


   Thanks


      Luis


-------------------------
Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
> 
> Luis, Jim,
> 
> I'm a bit surprised to see Jim's contribution about object geometry  
> already in the list of papers to move to Review directory: this is  
> unexpectedly fast and I didn't have time to submit a full review of  
> that code. This contribution is of particular interest for me because:
> * it provides some tools I need
> * it provides many things I have also implemented in my contribution  
> about label object¹
> 
> Jim seems to have a far better knowledge of all that stuff than me,  but 
> my contribution give a more general framework for all that kind of  
> attributes associated to an object, and a memory representation which  
> should allow much efficient attribute computations. I was hoping that  
> the two contributions could be merged to take benefit of both of them,  
> and avoid features duplication in different parts of the toolkit.
> 
> Is it still time for discussions?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gaëtan
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/publication/176
> 
> 
> Le 19 sept. 08 à 20:06, Luis Ibanez a écrit :
> 
>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Thanks for attending the tcon.
>> (yeap, we probably should find a better name than "tcon" at this  point)
>>
>>
>> As we discussed, a draft list of papers to move from the Insight  Journal
>> to the Code/Review directory for the release of ITK 3.10 has been  added
>> to the Wiki page:
>>
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_Schedule#Release_3.10_Schedule
>>
>> The "Generalized Computation of Gaussian Derivatives Using ITK" paper
>> has been added to this list. Please feel free to keep adding any other
>> papers that you consider interesting.
>>
>> From this list we will prioritize papers, and get volunteers who will
>> move the papers into the Code/Review directory.
>>
>> As we do this, the rule is to make sure that the tests that came with
>> the paper are moved into the Testing/Code/Review directory, and that
>> we maintain the KWStyle (Style checker) submission at zero errors.
>>
>> Thanks for volunteering to help move papers.
>>
>>
>>
>>   Regards,
>>
>>
>>       Luis
>>
>>
>> ---------------------
>> Dan Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lius,
>>> I can not attend the Tcon (is that still a good name?) today, but I  am
>>> curious what process is used to determine the transfer of Insight
>>> Journal papers to the review folder.
>>> Some of the articles being considered for inclusion (as listed on the
>>> Wiki agenda) are quite new, in fact the only submission which has  been
>>> reviewed by a human is #301. So why are these new publications with  no
>>> reviews being considered over publications with proven applicability
>>> (more views/downloads) and quality (more human reviews)?
>>> Take for example:
>>>   http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/publication/179
>>> It was originally submitted over 12 months ago, has considerable  views
>>> and downloads (views: 1955, downloads: 716), and two human reviews.  (I
>>> must concede the automated tests are not 100% at the moment, but if
>>> the paper was considered for inclusion, I'm sure the author could
>>> rectify that). There are of course other examples, however this is  one
>>> that I personally want to see in ITK proper.
>>> Is the process of transfer from IJ to review folder simply a  developer
>>> or user saying to the ITK gatekeepers: "hey, I want such and such
>>> paper considered for inclusion"?
>>> Cheers, Dan
>>> 2008/9/19 Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>:
>>>
>>>> The agenda for today's ITK Tcon 2.0 is now available in the Wiki.
>>>>
>>>>  http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Agenda%26Status_091908
>>>>
>>>> We will discuss:
>>>>
>>>> * The release schedule for ITK 3.10
>>>> * Moving papers from the Insight Journal into the Review dir
>>>> * itk::Image behaving like itk::OrientedImage
>>>> * Lesion sizing toolkit in development
>>>> * ImageIO API for GUI support
>>>>
>>>> Please feel free to add any topics.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Instructions to join the Tcon are available at
>>>>
>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_in_Second_Life
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Luis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Insight-developers mailing list
>>>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Insight-developers mailing list
>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> 
>