[Insight-users] CMTK 1.0 Released
Luis Ibanez
luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Tue Jun 30 15:43:27 EDT 2009
Hi Torsten,
Congratulations for the release of CMTK 1.0 !
Any chance that you may consider distributing the code
under a BSD or Apache 2 license ?
Thanks
Luis
-------------------------
Torsten Rohlfing wrote:
> Greetings, and apologies for the non-ITK topic.
>
> As a one-time notice, I would like to let everyone know that we recently
> released version 1.0 of the Computational Morphometry Toolkit under the
> GPL, available in source and pre-compiled for selected platforms from
> http://www.nitrc.org/projects/cmtk/
>
> The toolkit consists of a number of general purpose image processing
> libraries with a collection of command line tools as the primary front
> end, i.e., this is mainly intended for batch processing (but we are
> working on implementing Slicer plugin auto-detection). All essential
> algorithms are implemented using SMP parallelism (POSIX threads and
> OpenMP), and some CPU hogs (groupwise registration) also come in
> distributed (MPI) variants.
>
> The name CMTK is admittedly a bit misleading, because there are tools
> somewhat more general than morphometry, e.g., bias field correction,
> super-resolution volume reconstruction, label fusion (STAPLE), to name
> just a few. But what can you do, the child needs a name ;)
>
> Note that CMTK is not meant to compete with ITK in any way -- but thanks
> to reading and writing Analyze, Nrrd, NIFTI, it will interface with ITK,
> FSL, etc. just fine. A primary goal of releasing CMTK is to make
> available all software that I have been working on for, oh, ten years or
> so, and much of it actually predates ITK. So in addition to making
> available tools that I felt were missing or hard to use in other
> software collections (not to mention any names), this provides access to
> the source code of virtually all tools that I have used in my academic
> papers over the years.
>
> So feel free to take a peek and maybe take a tool or two for a spin!
> Documentation is still a bit sparse but improving.
>
> Best,
> Torsten
>
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list