[Insight-users] DASHBOARD FEST 1.0: OPEN NOW !

[Oleksandr Dzyubak]

Hi Luis,

I see.

I intentionally left Python, Java, and all that staff out
since it still ruins my parallel builds. So I disabled wrapping.

Alex

Luis Ibanez wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> This may be related to the failures that Gaetan wanted to track.
>
> We should analyze the collections of submissions from the
> Dashboard Fest to track the source of the problem.
>
> We suspect that something in the configuration of ITK CMakeLists.txt
> file may be preventing the parallel-testing feature of CTest to work
> properly.
>
> BTW: Did you enable Wrapping in any of those builds ?
>
>
>      Thanks
>
>
>              Luis
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Oleksandr Dzyubak <adzyubak at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> It's very strange. I tried to submit the test below.
>>
>> Helium.Opteron16-cmake28
>> <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewSite.php?siteid=2194&project=2&currenttime=1257469200>make
>> -j16 <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/buildSummary.php?buildid=466110>
>> ctest-2.8.0-rc5 <javascript:alert("ctest-2.8.0-rc5");>
>>
>> And I got an error: "Empty reply from server. " So I concluded
>> that it cannot be uploaded.
>> In fact, after some while it did appear on the dashboard
>> but with "0" failed tests which is wrong since
>> on my machine it showed 6 failed tests.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> Oleksandr Dzyubak wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Luis,
>>>
>>> I keep resubmitting but even though it says: "Submission successful",
>>> it ends up with the error "Error while running CTest". What does that
>>> mean?
>>> Is that because of 2.8 or multi-core features?
>>>
>>> Still not all my submissions can get through.
>>> Most of them end up with "Empty reply from server".
>>>
>>> And also if running on a single core, I get no failed tests but
>>> when running on multi-cores, I always get  some
>>> (not the same ones) tests failed.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>> It's great to hear that now all those 16 cores are being used   :-)
>>>>
>>>> I'm submitting a couple of Experimental build now, so I'll be able
>>>> to check if the "Empty replay from server" message is more than
>>>> a temporary condition. (will let you know as soon as one of them
>>>> finishes).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks for participating on the Dashboard Fest !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        Luis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Oleksandr Dzyubak <adzyubak at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi Luis,
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I see what you mean.  All my 16 cores are just smoking!
>>>>> But now I have another problem.
>>>>> While trying to upload, I am getting an error:
>>>>> "Empty replay from server. Problems when submitting via HTTP".
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it from my side or yours?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you using CMake 2.8 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My apologies for not having highlighted that in the instructions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just added a note to the Wiki page:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_10th_Anniversary_Activities/Dashboard_Fest_1.0#Submitting_a_Parallel_Build
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can get binaries of CMake 2.8 at
>>>>>> http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or you could build it from source code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Please let us know if that  helps,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Luis
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Oleksandr Dzyubak <adzyubak at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Hi Luis,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Quick question on a parallel build submission.
>>>>>>> I tested that on my 16 core machine and strictly followed your
>>>>>>>  instructions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  ctest -j8 -D Experimental
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I started  with  -j1, then -j16, and -j32. During the test I
>>>>>>> monitored
>>>>>>> memory and core load and I do not see any difference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am I doing something wrong or it has very small sensitivity?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> The DASHBOARD FEST 1.0  is open Now !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anybody can participate,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Simply follow the instructions in:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_10th_Anniversary_Activities/Dashboard_Fest_1.0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are encouraged to submit parallel builds,
>>>>>>>> by following the instructions in:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_10th_Anniversary_Activities/Dashboard_Fest_1.0#Submitting_a_Parallel_Build
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Luis
>>>>>>>> _____________________________________
>>>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>           
>>