[Insight-users] Image pixel type safety

[Mathieu Malaterre]

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Wagner Sales <wsales at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> Thanks to answer. I think using ushort will be less expensive to
> process. But some algorithms in ITK expects double or float. And I
> want to run away from conversions of pixel types.
> Using double are so most expensive to be prohibitive as default? My
> datasets are, in most cases, between 80MB or 120MB.

Sorry I have no idea.You have to check your requirements. If you can
process your image in double, then go for it.

-- 
Mathieu