[Insight-users] Implications of the number of samples of the Mattes Mutual Information metric

[Gabriele Arnulfo]

On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 13:26 +0200, Jon Haitz Legarreta Gorroño wrote:
> However, I was stunned when I found that omitting the call to
> SetNumberOfSpatialSamples yields results comparable to the ones
> provided by a large number of spatial samples (at this point I did not
> pay attention to the computational cost).
> This behavior seems strange to me. 


AFAIK if Set method is omitted a default value is used but. Look into
the code of the class in order to figure it out. 

Best regards,

g.