[Insight-users] Does ConfidenceConnectedImageFilter remove pixels?

[Miklos Espak]

The problem happens when the multiplier is below 1.0. Is it a misuse to
specify such a multiplier?

I attached a sample code, and I will send the sample image in private.
(0.5MB)

Thanks,
Miklos

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Karthik Krishnan <
karthik.krishnan at kitware.com> wrote:

> It should not. Are you adding as seeds an entire mask of pixels ? Can
> you post a minimal working example demonstrating this
>
> thx
>
> On 5/3/11, Miklos Espak <espakm at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can the ConfidenceConnectedImageFilter remove pixels from the detected
> > region?
> >
> > I found that if I increase the number of iterations (from 3 to 30), the
> > created mask will contain fewer pixels.
> >
> > The documentation says that "letting the algorithm run for more
> iterations
> > the region will end up engulfing the entire image", but I have not found
> > anything about that the region may shrink.
> >
> > How is that possible?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Miklos
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20110503/5c4304d8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: confconntest.cpp
Type: text/x-c++src
Size: 1400 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20110503/5c4304d8/attachment.cpp>