[Insight-users] Bug Report: itkZeroFluxNeumannBoundaryCondition.h

Cory Quammen cquammen at cs.unc.edu
Thu Feb 16 21:43:25 EST 2012


Thanks for the report. I think the figures for the other
PadImageFilter filters are wrong. The indices 0 and 1 should be
swapped in the figures.

David, I think you made these figures originally. Do you concur that
the indices should be swapped in the figures?

Thanks,
Cory

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Mengqiu Tian <tianmengqiu at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using itkZeroFluxNeumannPadImageFilter.h to pad my image, here I found
> a bug.
>
> According to other PadImageFilter, take MirrorPadImageFilter for example:
>
> http://www.itk.org/Doxygen/html/classitk_1_1MirrorPadImageFilter.html
>
> lowerBound[0] and upperBound[0] should correspond to vertical direction.
>
> But ZeroFluxNeumannPadImageFilter does not consist with this behavior.
> lowerBound[0] and upperBound[0] corrspond to horizontal direction in this
> case.
> Although it is not a big deal, it might cause misunderstanding. I think it
> is better to correct it.
>
> Hope it helps. :)
>
> Regards,
> Mengqiu Tian
>
> _____________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>



-- 
Cory Quammen
Research Associate
Department of Computer Science
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill


More information about the Insight-users mailing list