[ITK-users] Cable Swig, what changes to normal swig

[Timo Wiegel]

Hello,

I used swig for a Matab Wrapper. There is a Matlab Modul for swig by jaeandersson (https://github.com/jaeandersson/swig).
Because I work on a Windows System I used MinGW to compile, which isn't a nice work.

As I saw, the swig/CableSwig implementation of Kitware, so I tried to move to CableSwig. I'm a happy user of CMake :).

I now see there is some difference in the swig-syntax. Can you sum up the changes for me, so I have an opinion how long I will need for the move to CableSwig.

At the moment I see:
Fragments can't be type specialized as in swig.
Is there a reason you removed this?
I think I could change this for me, but if there are lot of those changes it will be to time consuming.

The swig-language-moduls have a little bit different interface. I think if there aren't to many changes, I could change the matlab modul, to work with CableSwig

Thx
Timo


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20151103/56bbf9bf/attachment.html>