[ITK-users] Cable Swig, what changes to normal swig

[Matt McCormick]

Hi Timo,

The CableSwig package is no longer supported.  We currently use
upstream swig for wrapping ITK. In general, though, CMake works well
for building swig output.

HTH,
Matt

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Timo Wiegel <wiegel at mv.uni-kl.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I used swig for a Matab Wrapper. There is a Matlab Modul for swig by
> jaeandersson (https://github.com/jaeandersson/swig).
>
> Because I work on a Windows System I used MinGW to compile, which isn’t a
> nice work.
>
>
>
> As I saw, the swig/CableSwig implementation of Kitware, so I tried to move
> to CableSwig. I’m a happy user of CMake J.
>
>
>
> I now see there is some difference in the swig-syntax. Can you sum up the
> changes for me, so I have an opinion how long I will need for the move to
> CableSwig.
>
>
>
> At the moment I see:
>
> Fragments can’t be type specialized as in swig.
>
> Is there a reason you removed this?
>
> I think I could change this for me, but if there are lot of those changes it
> will be to time consuming.
>
>
>
> The swig-language-moduls have a little bit different interface. I think if
> there aren’t to many changes, I could change the matlab modul, to work with
> CableSwig
>
>
>
> Thx
>
> Timo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>