[ITK-users] [ITK] Community versus Users Lists

Sat Apr 2 13:34:01 EDT 2016

Third option from bottom has a semantic error in it: *"community" and
"insight-developers" should be made read-only, and all members will need to
manually subscribe to "community"* (should be *insight-users*).

The rest looks good.

Regards

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
wrote:

> Here is a draft of the poll:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/19BL8Gbb3Z0qdekys2i6keHPZSdkSOgbRg84mWOhEu8U/viewform
>
> Are there any suggestions on the wording? Missing options?
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Matt McCormick <
> matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> Doodle polls are usually for scheduling times only (as far as I am
>> aware).  Perhaps a Google Form?
>>
>> M
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Dženan Zukić <dzenanz at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > since ITK is now in a mature phase, there is not a lot of traffic on
>> > ITK-Developers. I suppose the best would be to completely transition to
>> just
>> > one list (community) which was created for that purpose. This would
>> simplify
>> > things.
>> >
>> > But having a poll sounds like a good idea. Did you mean something like a
>> > Doodle poll, or somehow restrict the poll to just the members of the 3
>> > mailing lists?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Dženan
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Matt McCormick
>> > <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> The current situation is not optimal, and it is difficult to keep all
>> >> parties involved happy.
>> >>
>> >> - Some people do not want to be bothered to subscribe to more than one
>> >> list, be it community, insight-users, or insight-developers.
>> >> - Some people on insight-developers do not want to be auto-subscribed
>> >> to a different list that has a different amount of traffic.
>> >> - There are a number of non-mailman interfaces to the mailing lists
>> >> that may not adapt to changes (Nabble, GMane, etc.), and some people
>> >> use these interfaces exclusively.
>> >>
>> >> Any change will result in some unhappy campers, but some change may
>> >> still be necessary to improve the status quo.
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps we should create a poll distributed to all lists to select a
>> >> way forward? Other constructive ideas?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Matt
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Andras Lasso <lasso at queensu.ca>
>> wrote:
>> >> > I completely agree. Either a single community list or pair of
>> >> > devel&users
>> >> > makes sense.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > My personal experience: I've signed up to the community list when it
>> was
>> >> > created and unsubscribed from users. However, it was quite annoying
>> that
>> >> > I
>> >> > received emails from users list but my responses were bounced. So, I
>> had
>> >> > to
>> >> > sign up again to the users list. I still don’t know where to send new
>> >> > posts:
>> >> > users or community.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Andras
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > From: Michka Popoff
>> >> > Sent: March 26, 2016 14:24
>> >> > To: Matt McCormick
>> >> > Cc: community at itk.org
>> >> > Subject: Re: [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi
>> >> >
>> >> > one thought about this. If I remember well, (but I may be mistaken),
>> >> > the community at itk.org address was introduced to replace the two
>> others.
>> >> >
>> >> > Now, we have to follow 3 different mailing lists. The mail traffic is
>> >> > okay
>> >> > for me on
>> >> > these 3 lists, so having only one would be great.
>> >> > It would help people to know which one to use.
>> >> >
>> >> > Or we should go back to the old behaviour, with a user/developer
>> list.
>> >> > But I think developers want also to know what they users are doing,
>> >> > so they are often registered on the two (/three) anyway.
>> >> >
>> >> > Michka
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 17 Mar 2016, at 16:42, Matt McCormick <
>> matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Toby,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To post to the insight-users or insight-developers list, your email
>> >> >> account currently needs to be subscribed there, too.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Matt
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Wood, Tobias <
>> tobias.wood at kcl.ac.uk>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> Hello,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Apologies for a newbie question but this has been bugging me for a
>> >> >>> while.
>> >> >>> I am subscribed to the community at itk.org mailing list. As noted
>> on the
>> >> >>> sign-up page, this also receives all the mail from insight-users
>> (and
>> >> >>> insight-developers). When I try to reply to a message from one of
>> >> >>> these
>> >> >>> lists in my mail client, the reply-to address is set to
>> insight-users.
>> >> >>> If I
>> >> >>> send the message as is, I get a failure message telling me I am not
>> >> >>> subscribed to the mailing list (which is correct).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> How should I be responding to such e-mail threads? Will a reply to
>> >> >>> community at itk.org forward the message on to insight-users? Or
>> should I
>> >> >>> be
>> >> >>> subscribing to all 3 mailing lists (seems suboptimal as I assume I
>> >> >>> will get
>> >> >>> multiple copies of messages).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Thanks,
>> >> >>> Toby
>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> Community mailing list
>> >> >>> Community at itk.org
>> >> >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> Community mailing list
>> >> >> Community at itk.org
>> >> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Community mailing list
>> >> > Community at itk.org
>> >> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Community mailing list
>> >> Community at itk.org
>> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20160402/913fe058/attachment.html>