ITK/Release 4/Enhancing Image Registration Framework: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
#* Sean Megason and Julian Jomier | #* Sean Megason and Julian Jomier | ||
# Georgetown: Automated parameter tuning | # Georgetown: Automated parameter tuning | ||
#* Ziv Yaniv, | #* Ziv Yaniv, Andinet Enquobahrie | ||
# Utah: Score | # Utah: Score | ||
#* Marcel Prastawa, Julien Jomier, G. Gerig, J. Fillon-Robin | #* Marcel Prastawa, Julien Jomier, G. Gerig, J. Fillon-Robin |
Revision as of 15:17, 17 November 2010
Enhancing Image Registration Framework
Goals
- Review v4 registration plans and progress.
- Catalog target use cases.
- Discuss design changes in core itk to support these enhancements.
- Wishlist items beyond standard use cases, e.g. projective transform (itkPerspective3DTransform).
Discussion Items
- Separate sampling (interpolation strategy) and metric computation
- Separate computation of derivative components via chain rule.
- Enable registration of generalized data-types.
- Multiple metrics and/or multiple optimizers?
- Add feature based registration techniques (SIFT (patented?), SURF, etc)
Refactoring of optimization framework
Proposal for Revised Framework
Related Groups (A2D2)
- BWH: Score++
- Sean Megason and Julian Jomier
- Georgetown: Automated parameter tuning
- Ziv Yaniv, Andinet Enquobahrie
- Utah: Score
- Marcel Prastawa, Julien Jomier, G. Gerig, J. Fillon-Robin
- Utah: Time-Varying Shape Modeling
- T. Fletcher, J. Cater, R. MacLeod, C. McGann, S. Callahan
- William+mary*: Non-Rigid Registration for Image Guided Neurosurgery
- N. Chrisochoides et al.
Notes:
(a) #3, #4, and #5 should be consulted during the actual refactoring of the registration framework. (b) #1, #2, and #3 should be involved with the design of a web-based parameter estimation, comparison.
Tcons
(Add one page for every tcon).