ITK/Release 4/Enhancing Image Registration Framework: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Tcons) |
Daviddoria (talk | contribs) m (moved ITK Release 4/Enhancing Image Registration Framework to ITK/Release 4/Enhancing Image Registration Framework) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Wishlist items beyond standard use cases, e.g. projective transform (itkPerspective3DTransform). | * Wishlist items beyond standard use cases, e.g. projective transform (itkPerspective3DTransform). | ||
* [[ITK_Release_4/Enhancing Image Registration Framework/Goals]] | |||
= Discussion Items = | = Discussion Items = | ||
| Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
[[Proposals:Refactoring of optimization framework|Refactoring of optimization framework]] | [[Proposals:Refactoring of optimization framework|Refactoring of optimization framework]] | ||
[[Proposal for Revised Framework]] | [[Proposal for Revised Framework]] (Old) | ||
[[ITK_Release_4/Enhancing Image Registration Framework/Proposal for Revised Framework|Proposal for Revised Framework]] | |||
[http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/Wish_List#Image_Registration Wish List for ITKv4 ] | [http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/Wish_List#Image_Registration Wish List for ITKv4 ] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 9 December 2011
Enhancing Image Registration Framework
Goals
- Review v4 registration plans and progress.
- Catalog target use cases.
- Discuss design changes in core itk to support these enhancements.
- Wishlist items beyond standard use cases, e.g. projective transform (itkPerspective3DTransform).
Discussion Items
- Separate sampling (interpolation strategy) and metric computation
- Separate computation of derivative components via chain rule.
- Enable registration of generalized data-types.
- Multiple metrics and/or multiple optimizers?
- Add feature based registration techniques (SIFT (patented?), SURF, etc)
Refactoring of optimization framework
Proposal for Revised Framework (Old)
Proposal for Revised Framework
Related Groups (A2D2)
- BWH: Score++
- Sean Megason and Julian Jomier
- Georgetown: Automated parameter tuning
- Ziv Yaniv, Andinet Enquobahrie
- Utah: Score
- Marcel Prastawa, Julien Jomier, G. Gerig, J. Fillon-Robin
- Utah: Time-Varying Shape Modeling
- T. Fletcher, J. Cater, R. MacLeod, C. McGann, S. Callahan
- William+mary*: Non-Rigid Registration for Image Guided Neurosurgery
- N. Chrisochoides et al.
Notes:
(a) #3, #4, and #5 should be consulted during the actual refactoring of the registration framework. (b) #1, #2, and #3 should be involved with the design of a web-based parameter estimation, comparison.
Tcons
(Add one page for every tcon).
