[Insight-developers] ITKv4 Module Names
gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr
Thu Feb 10 14:53:17 EST 2011
Le 10 févr. 11 à 19:32, Brad King a écrit :
> On 02/10/2011 12:21 PM, Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
>> IO-Base and IO-Raw look a bit strange, aren't they? Shouldn't they be
>> placed in the IO group?
> Perhaps. This grouping is based on what's in the Modularization/
> file in the main ITK tree.
>> I don't like much the 2 levels of directories, as it is sometime
>> redundant with the module name. I also guess that's because of them
>> that we have the strange IO-Raw and IO-Base?
The problem there is that the first layer of directory doesn't contain
In that case, it is possible to be in the core of ITK and be related
So maybe it would be better to keep the subdirectories for the really
easy to group modules, like the IO modules.
>> Several IO modules don't have at least their first letter in
>> uppercase, like ITK-IO-jpeg. I suppose their name should match the
>> name of the class in ITK.
> See my response to Bill L. a few minutes ago.
>> The glob would then be
> I'll see if the logic can work that way, but I'm a little concerned
> about what happens if we find
> in one directory.
Yes you're right. It would make the logic more complex for a very
Having it not called with the usual CMakeLists.txt is nice already.
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66 fax: 01 34 65 29 09
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une signature ?lectronique PGP
More information about the Insight-developers