[Insight-users] Procrustes registration again

[imho]

Thank you, as I use VTK and ITK together, I can try to use this class.
The procrustes needs as you said some landmarks (3 minimum from each 
model), and I think use it as first registration, to align imperfectly 
the two models. I'll try to find 3 non-moving points.
It may reduce the calculation costs for the others registration steps.

Luis > What do you think about this filter, if I put it in my pipeline? 
(I already have VTK -> ITK -> VTK, I can add a VTK task in this)

thanks,
imho

Rasmus Reinhold Paulsen wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, imho wrote:
> 
> 
>>As I said to you before, I would like to implement a procrustes myself 
> 
> 
> If you would like to implement Procrustes in the ITK framework I would
> recommend you to look at:
> 
> http://www.vtk.org/doc/nightly/html/classvtkProcrustesAlignmentFilter.html
> 
> for inspiration.
> 
> 
>>(the registration steps I'd like to try : procrustes -> ICP -> one 
>>deformable registration, maybe your demon's registration) , how could I 
>>use your optimizer? Is it possible?
> 
> 
> I do not understand though how you would use Procrustes in a registration
> task. It requires point correspondence? You would either need
> manually annotated landmarks or some kind of prior registration of your
> shapes generating semi-landmarks.
> 
> Regards,
> Rasmus
> 
> 
> 
>