[Insight-users] Re: Problem building 2.4 on .Net 2003

[John Tourtellott]

Oh, I am one of those people who had tried (in vain) to get syntax 
highlighting of .txx files by putting them in the "VC++ Build" list 
(i.e., marking them as compilable). Once I undid that, a clean build was 
successful. Thanks very much for your help, Luis.

john


>Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:51:05 -0500
>From: Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Insight-users] Re: Problem building 2.4 on
>	.Net 2003]
>To: Vicente Grau <vicente at robots.ox.ac.uk>
>Cc: insight-users at itk.org
>Message-ID: <43958939.5020007 at kitware.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
>Hi Vicente,
>
>Are you sure that your .txx are not marked as "compilable" ?
>
>One easy way to verify it, is to go to the VS IDE and in
>any project select the folder of "sources", then right-click
>on any of the .txx files and check if "compile" appears as
>an option.
>
>
>BTW: The best way of getting syntax highlighting for .txx
>      files under Windows is to use:
>
>           1) Vim    http://www.vim.org
>or
>           2) Emacs
>
>You can setup Vi as the default editor for Visual Studio.
>
>
>You don't need to uninstall previous versions of ITK, as long
>as you are sure that you are not mixing their directories
>in your projects.
>
>
>---
>
>Important Question:
>
>1) When you build ITK 1.8 or 2.0.1 in your system,
>    Did you experienced any similar problem ?
>
>2) When you build ITK 1.8 and 2.0.1 in your system,
>    Did you used the same Version of CMake that you
>    are using now for configuring ITK 2.4 ?
>    (please do a formal verification, because the
>     answer to this question is quite relevant.)
>
>    If you were using a different version of CMake,
>    then, could you please (in a fresh build) configure
>    ITK 2.0.1 with the CMake that you are using for
>    ITK 2.4 and try to build it ?
>
>
>
>
>Please let us know,
>
>
>    Thanks
>
>
>
>       Luis
>
>  
>