[Insight-users] Re: Problem building 2.4 on .Net 2003

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi John,

Thanks for letting us know that the build problem
was due to having marked the .txx files as 'compilable'.


It is likely that Vincents' problem is the same.


Vincent:


    Could you please confirm if this is the case ?




    Thanks


       Luis



-----------------------
John Tourtellott wrote:
> Oh, I am one of those people who had tried (in vain) to get syntax 
> highlighting of .txx files by putting them in the "VC++ Build" list 
> (i.e., marking them as compilable). Once I undid that, a clean build was 
> successful. Thanks very much for your help, Luis.
> 
> john
> 
> 
>> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:51:05 -0500
>> From: Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Insight-users] Re: Problem building 2.4 on
>>     .Net 2003]
>> To: Vicente Grau <vicente at robots.ox.ac.uk>
>> Cc: insight-users at itk.org
>> Message-ID: <43958939.5020007 at kitware.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>>
>> Hi Vicente,
>>
>> Are you sure that your .txx are not marked as "compilable" ?
>>
>> One easy way to verify it, is to go to the VS IDE and in
>> any project select the folder of "sources", then right-click
>> on any of the .txx files and check if "compile" appears as
>> an option.
>>
>>
>> BTW: The best way of getting syntax highlighting for .txx
>>      files under Windows is to use:
>>
>>           1) Vim    http://www.vim.org
>> or
>>           2) Emacs
>>
>> You can setup Vi as the default editor for Visual Studio.
>>
>>
>> You don't need to uninstall previous versions of ITK, as long
>> as you are sure that you are not mixing their directories
>> in your projects.
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Important Question:
>>
>> 1) When you build ITK 1.8 or 2.0.1 in your system,
>>    Did you experienced any similar problem ?
>>
>> 2) When you build ITK 1.8 and 2.0.1 in your system,
>>    Did you used the same Version of CMake that you
>>    are using now for configuring ITK 2.4 ?
>>    (please do a formal verification, because the
>>     answer to this question is quite relevant.)
>>
>>    If you were using a different version of CMake,
>>    then, could you please (in a fresh build) configure
>>    ITK 2.0.1 with the CMake that you are using for
>>    ITK 2.4 and try to build it ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please let us know,
>>
>>
>>    Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>       Luis
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
> 
>