[Insight-users] [Insight-developers] fixing a few remaining failing tests relating to pixel-centered coordinates

Simon Warfield simon.warfield at childrens.harvard.edu
Thu May 21 07:57:13 EDT 2009


Bill Lorensen wrote:
> Yes, I think that will be OK. We should add an Attention: warning to
> the CMakeLists.txt file. Something like:
>
>   SET(msg "Attention: You have chosen to enable the use of
> cell-centered coordinates.")
>   
The tool kit currently uses a mixture of both, so the above is a bit 
misleading. How about instead:
SET(msg "Attention: You have chosen to enable the consistent use of 
centered pixel coordinates.")

We should explain the pros and cons of the choice e.g.:
>   SET(msg "${msg} This new functionality has not been fully validated.
> USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.")
>   
SET(msg "${msg} The old functionality creates an inconsistent physical 
coordinate system.")
>   SET(msg "${msg} With this ON, you can expect to see differences in
> registration and interpolation results.")
>   
differences -> improvements
> # display the message during the setup
> MESSAGE("${msg}")
>   

--
Simon
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Wes Turner <wes.turner at kitware.com> wrote:
>   
>> Bill,
>> I think the idea is to disable the cell-centered functionality until after
>> the release.  I.e. the code will be in, but not enabled in the CMake
>> options.  Is this an acceptable alternative?
>> - Wes
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>     
>>> I understand the current situation. I do believe however that we
>>> should validate the new techniques. Regression testing is meant to
>>> track changes in the code but they do not validate the code. Before we
>>> release ITK with these new capabilities I think we should make sure
>>> the code is correct. Even if this means we have to delay the release.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michel Audette
>>> <michel.audette at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi Bill,
>>>>
>>>> so far we are only modifying existing tests that were failing. The
>>>> following
>>>> tests include new code,
>>>>
>>>> Code/BasicFilters/itkExpandImageFilterTest.cxx:
>>>> Code/BasicFilters/itkVectorExpandImageFilterTest.cxx:
>>>> Code/Common/itkBSplineDeformableTransformTest2.cxx
>>>>
>>>> which assume pixel-centeredness. Moreover, many other tests have new
>>>> regression data committed, and ctest selects the appropriate data set
>>>> depending on the value of these flags.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>
>>>> Michel
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Do we have a test that validates the centered pixel and portable round
>>>>> options? For example, a 1D example that can be manual verified.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Michel Audette
>>>>> <michel.audette at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Dear members of the Insight Community,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> in response to bug 6558, Luis and I have implemented some changes
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> produce pixel-centered coordinates, as well as a few other needed
>>>>>> refinements, which are enabled by the flags
>>>>>> ITK_USE_CENTERED_PIXEL_COORDINATES_CONSISTENTLY,
>>>>>> ITK_USE_REGION_VALIDATION_IN_ITERATORS and
>>>>>> ITK_USE_PORTABLE_ROUND
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With the flags turned off, the code behaves as before, with no
>>>>>> failing
>>>>>> tests. With the flags turned on there are still a number of failing
>>>>>> tests,
>>>>>> that are related to these new coordinates, and which have been
>>>>>> whittled
>>>>>> down
>>>>>> from more than 25 to 14 currently.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nonetheless, we would like to get rid of as many of these as we can
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> next
>>>>>> Monday, for the upcoming release of ITK, and consequently, we would
>>>>>> respectfully ask interested members of the community to lend a hand
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> remaining tests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will be submitting an Experimental ctest on a regular basis, with
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> signature metropolis-pixelcentered.kitware
>>>>>> Currently the failing tests are the following.
>>>>>>     169 - itkSampleSelectiveMeanShiftBlurringFilterTest (Failed)
>>>>>>     340 - itkMedialNodeCorrespondencesTest (Failed)
>>>>>>     543 - itkImportImageTest (Failed)
>>>>>>     572 - itkNonThreadedShrinkImageTest (Failed)
>>>>>>     594 - itkShrinkImageTest (Failed)
>>>>>>     615 - itkStreamingImageFilterTest2 (Failed)
>>>>>>     630 - itkWarpImageFilterTest (Failed)
>>>>>>     632 - itkWarpVectorImageFilterTest (Failed)
>>>>>>     800 - itkMattesMutualInformationImageToImageMetricTest (Failed)
>>>>>>     801 - itkMattesMutualInformationImageToImageMetricTest2 (Failed)
>>>>>>     802 - itkMattesMutualInformationImageToImageMetricTest3 (Failed)
>>>>>>     803 - itkMattesMutualInformationImageToImageMetricTest4 (Failed)
>>>>>>     816 - itkMultiResolutionPDEDeformableRegistrationTest (Failed)
>>>>>>     1470 - ResampleImageFilter9Test (Failed)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I plan to work on failing tests relating to the itkShrinkImageFilter
>>>>>> class.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your kind consideration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michel
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Michel Audette, Ph.D.
>>>>>> R & D Engineer,
>>>>>> Kitware Inc.,
>>>>>> Chapel Hill, N.C.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michel Audette, Ph.D.
>>>> R & D Engineer,
>>>> Kitware Inc.,
>>>> Chapel Hill, N.C.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>       
>>
>> --
>> Wesley D. Turner, Ph.D.
>> Kitware, Inc.
>> R&D Engineer
>> 28 Corporate Drive
>> Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
>> Phone: 518-371-3971 x120
>>
>>     
>
>
>   






More information about the Insight-users mailing list